Stock Market In Bottoming Process

By Alexander Paris, editor
The Alexander Paris Report

       Although uncertainties remain and we have yet to see what looks like a sustained rebound, we sense a growing feeling among investors that the worst of the stock market decline is behind them, even if they are not ready to jump in headlong. In recent publications, we have been compiling a growing list of the factors currently present that generally mark bear market bottoms and repeat some of them below. Most are technical in nature and only provide growing evidence of at least a short-term bottom soon. The bottom is likely to be an elongated one as a new base is built rather than a one-day turn. The keys to a sustainable new bull market are more fundamental in nature.
       The economic recovery being a slow one should come as no surprise to readers of The Alexander Paris Report. A very slow-growing economy is more vulnerable to temporary shocks and another modestly negative GDP quarter is possible, although in our opinion not likely. Even so, it would not likely have much impact on the stock market since it has not been discounting much. Ironically, the weaker than expected second quarter GDP and, more importantly, the government's revisions that showed not one, but three negative GDP quarters in 2001, may become a positive for the stock market. Many investors were confused by the very modest so-called recession in light of a major downturn in the manufacturing sector, a record contraction in most sectors of capital spending, a record inventory liquidation and lower consumer income growth last year. It became very difficult for investors to discount a strong economic rebound when there did not appear to be much correction from which to recover. Consequently, instead of leading the economic recovery the stock market has been lagging it. Now, the news is out. There was a more significant recession and there is now a recovery to start discounting. It may have been a coincidence, but on July 31, with a significant negative surprise on the GDP, a lackluster Beige report and a sharp drop in the ISM Chicago purchasing managers' index, the economically sensitive DJIA rose in the absence of any other significant good news. Could the stock market be reverting to its traditional role as a leading indicator?
       If investors are going to pay more attention to looking over the economic valley to the expansion beyond it, they should also start paying more attention to the fact that corporate earnings hit bottom in the second quarter. They may even show a modest year-over-year comparison for the first time since the fourth quarter of 2000. There is still a question of how rapidly they will rise in the period ahead, but comparisons will clearly become more positive.

Accounting/Corporate Misbehavior

       Since the accounting irregularities and corporate malfeasance come to bear on investors' confidence in and uncertainty about underlying earnings, we would also include it under fundamentals. However, between the Democrats doing the best to politicize the subject for election benefits in the fall and the news feeding frenzy by their natural media allies, it has become a major emotional issue in the market this year.

This is not to say that most companies do not always like to depict their earnings in the best possible light. Although they do it within what are generally accepted accounting principles at the time. The bigger the preceding boom, the more rascals are discovered during the subsequent collapse that went well beyond those principles. Not surprisingly, most of the high-profile rascals this time around were big players in the technology bubble years. Did some break the law? Certainly and not surprisingly, they broke existing laws. We do not need a lot of new laws; only better enforcement and stiffer penalties, which we are receiving in the new corporate reform legislation. Did aggressive option practices contribute significantly to the bubble excesses? You bet, and they should probably be eliminated completely and replaced by other incentive alternatives. We should also note that the vast majority of public companies did not break any laws and generally stayed within the realm of generally accepted accounting principles. However, you can bet that they will be even more careful in the future and respect their shareholders more.
       There will be continuing repercussions of the misdeeds and subsequent reforms. However, we believe this major negative is in the process of disappearing as a major market factor. First of all, as a negative influence each new corporate revelation has to be bigger to have the same negative impact on investor psychology. We have a difficult time seeing what can be done for an encore that will shock investors much more. Second, the government quickly passed a corporate reform act that will satisfy many investor concerns. Investors lost a lot of money in technology and telecom stocks, primarily because of their own greed. However, they should feel better now that there is legislation, indicating that someone else can be blamed and punished. Third, by August 14, key officials of the 945 largest companies will attest to the accuracy of their financial statements and make any major restatements before that time. That should be another blow against the negative impact of this subject. Finally, politicians can all go off to their fall campaigns, with assurance to the investor/voters that they have helped to wreak revenge for them on their corporate tormentors. If not beforehand, it is a safe bet that corporate malfeasance would disappear as a political factor the day after the fall elections, as politicians in both parties begin seeking corporate contributions to their campaign treasure chests. While we are clearing the air, there have been numerous comments from the media that European investors have been concerned with the quality of U.S. corporate accounting and behavior and may, as a result, pull money out of our markets for that reason. However, they are having their own troubles with stock markets and corporate revelations. We have seen a couple of studies recently that confirmed our long-standing opinion about foreign accounting, formed after a number of sad experiences.
       They pointed out that of all the major countries in the world, the U.S. is number one in terms of clean accounting and reporting.

Signals Of A Major Market Bottom

       We are not nearly as comfortable talking about technical analysis of the stock market, but we have collected a fairly long list of bottoming indicators from a number of sources, which we have mentioned over the past few weeks. Some may have longer-term implications, but most testify only to the likelihood of at least a short-term bottom.
       High Volume: Volume tends to be very high at major market bottoms, especially around capitulation or climax selling. NYSE volume was of record proportions during the week ended July 26, exceeding 2 billion shares during four of the five sessions.
       Magazine Covers: While seemingly unscientific, bear market bottoms are frequently made just about the time that they become the most advertised by appearing on the front covers of a large number of magazines. When the existence of the bear market becomes so evident even to the media, it is usually about over. The same thing applies to other subjects. Remember the black cover years back on a major magazine with the question, Is Growth Dead?, just before the market started a major bull market in growth stocks. Similarly, over a decade ago major magazine covers called the Midwest the Rust Belt, referring to the utter defeat of U.S. manufacturers by the invincible Japanese, about the time U.S. caught up with and surpassed the Japanese, even with the recent industrial recession. Well, recent covers of such magazines as Time, the Economist and BusinessWeek all had pictures of bears with appropriate messages. This indicator may not be as unscientific as it sounds. By the time a bear market is so well recognized and advertised, most of the selling is done and short positions have grown, setting the stage for stronger markets with any kind of increased demand.
       Sentiment Indexes: Just about every technical analyst has his favorite sentiment index he swears by, all based on the contrarian principle that when opinion gets too crowded on one side it is time to move to the other side. With few, if any, exceptions, all the sentiment indicators were flashing bullish signs. To name just a few:
       Both Mark Hulbert and Investors Intelligence track market-timing newsletters to discern whether they are preponderantly bullish or bearish at any given time. By the week ended July 26, both reported a very heavy bearish weighting of the letters which, according to the contrarian principle, would mean it is time for the market to turn up.
       Put-call volume ratios have been very lopsided toward puts during recent heavy selling.
       Recently, less than 10% of S&P 500 stocks have been above their 10-week moving average.
       New low lists have been huge during heavy selling days.
       Nothing is Sacred Selling: For much of the year, most of the heavy selling was deservedly in the technology sector and, eliminating technology from major averages like the DJIA and S&P 500, they had not declined much. By June, investors began selling many attractive Old Economic stocks that had held up well to lock in profits or meet margin calls. The selling eventually spread to the small and mid-cap averages that had strong relative performance for the last two years. This is the kind of throw-in-the-towel selling prevalent around major bottoms.
       Mutual Fund Liquidation: Individuals have turned to heavy net liquidation of equity mutual funds lately, another kind of behavior we would expect to see at market bottoms. According to AMG Data, net mutual fund liquidation by the third week in July had reached over $30 billion, after a net outflow of over $18 billion in June, the third biggest outflow on record.
       Market Undervalued: After a long period of hand wringing about high P/E's, most valuation systems such as the popular Fed model, which relates earnings yields on the S&P 500 to the yield on 10-year Treasury notes, indicate the stock market is substantially undervalued. Take out the high-priced technology stocks, and the market would look even more undervalued. In another similar signal, the dividend yield on the S&P 500 recently crossed over the yield on the 3-month Treasury bill, only the third time in the last 32 years this has happened and each was followed by a significant rally.
       Enough is Enough: Finally, before talking about a major bottom, we have to ask ourselves has there been enough pain to warrant a bottom? At recent lows, the current bear market, in our opinion, qualified as the longest and most painful of the post-war period, edging out the devastating 1973 1974 bear market. In that one, the S&P 500 fell 48%, which was just about matched recently. Importantly, the 75% plunge in the Nasdaq, the worst of any major average since the Depression years, was enough to push the current bear market into post-wear record territory.
       A little searching would find a number of additional indicators that are flashing signals similar to those at previous major bottoms. That still says little about the extent and longevity of any market recovery. As mentioned, that depends more on the underlying fundamentals. There will be more debate about the economic outlook but, no matter how slow the economy may be in the near-term, the foundation for an extended recovery is already in place. More directly related to stock prices, corporate earnings hit bottom in the second quarter and may be up around 1% to 2% from, a year ago, according to First Call. Although analysts have been rightfully reducing earlier over-enthusiastic second half estimates since April 1, they are looking for increases around 13.5% in the third quarter and 25% in the four quarter. Even with further reductions, those results represent a substantial acceleration in year-over-year earnings comparisons, which the stock market is clearly not discounting. There has been a lot of damage to the stock market psychology and we may not see advances similar to a few years ago. However, this is clearly not the time to be selling and is the time to start rebuilding portfolios, with some good fundamental stock picking.

|| TABLE OF CONTENTS ||

Bull & Bear Newsletter Digest || Bull & Bear Reporter Featured Companies || Monetary Digest
|| Breaking News || Featured Newsletters || Featured Companies || Featured Services ||
|| Classifieds/Advertisers || Links || Bull & Bear Archive || Search || E-Mail ||
||
About Us || How to Subscribe ||How to Advertise || IR Programs ||

The Bull & Bear Financial Report
Copyright 2002 | All Rights Reserved
Reproduction in whole or part is strictly prohibited
without prior written permision
NOTE:
The Bull & Bear Financial Report does not itself endorse
or guarantee the accuracy or reliability of information,
statements or opinionsexpressed by any individuals or
organizations posted on this site
PLEASE READ DISCLAIMER

Web Site Designed & Maintained by

Estrada Design & Communications

in association with

THE BULL & BEAR INTERNET DIVISION
1-800-336-BULL