The Pink Slip Indicator

Tug of War Continues

by Barry Arnold, editor
The Primary Trend

       In early 2000, we made the case that all of the abuse directed at value investors for their recent plight in the face of the Tech bubble was a textbook example of a contrarian indicator. Value was being shunned on Wall Street at precisely the wrong time. An excerpt from the April 3, 2000, issue of The Primary Trend follows:
       It began innocently enough in early 1999, as a few of the value-oriented newsletter writers we swap ideas with started throwing in the towel and closing up shop. Charles Clough, the long-time strategist at Merrill Lynch, questioned the market's valuation levels for too long and found himself out of a job. Robert Sanborn, a highly regarded value investor at Oakmark Funds, has recently been replaced, and value man Gary Brinson has stepped down at UBS Asset Management. And, of course, we all are well aware of the media flogging that Warren Buffett has taken this year
       "Well, this bull market has notched another casualty on its belt Julian Robertson. Gamed value investor and head of hedge fund Tiger Asset Management, Mr. Robertson has decided to shut down his funds after assets dropped from $22 billion to $6 billion in just two years but two of the most painful years for contrarian value players. While it cannot be substantiated by empirical evidence, we believe these `value casualties' are similar to the `magazine cover indicator'. This overwhelming negative sentiment toward value and the `old economy' stocks may be the classic sign of a bottom for these sectors."
       As it turns out, value investing did indeed experience a reversal of fortunes that month. "Old economy" stocks embarked on a mini-bull run throughout 2000 and 2001, even in the face of the damaging bear market that inflicted pain on the rest of the stock market.
       Why do we bring this to investors' attention again? Because market psychology does play an important role in the future direction of stock prices especially at turning points. And today, the Pink Slip Indicator (borrowed from Business Week) is signaling higher stock prices ahead.
       Just before the bubble popped in 2000, several Wall Street brokerage houses fired their most bearish strategists and economists. As we mentioned, Chuck Clough was shown the door at Merrill Lynch. His doom and gloomster colleagues who suffered the same fate included J.P. Morgan's chief strategist Douglas Cliggott, Salomon Brothers' market strategist David Shulman and Oppenheimer's renowned chief strategist Michael Metz. With the benefit of hindsight, all were fired for being correctly bearish.
       Today, it is quite the opposite. Now, with the bear market raging, Wall Street is giving its bulls the "pink slip". The first such casualty was a year ago when Merrill Lynch's bullish strategist, Christine Callies, was replaced by long-time bear, Richard Bernstein. Merrill Lynch also booted bullish chief economist Bruce Steinberg in November in favor of the bearish David Rosenberg. Other high profile bulls who are unemployed include Credit Suisse First Boston's chief investment strategist, Tom Galvin, and Lehman Brothers' chief market strategist, Jeffrey Applegate.
       Even those bulls who have hung on to their jobs, such as Abby Joseph Cohen and Joe Battipaglia, have evidently been under house arrest and prohibited from speaking to the media.       The Pink Slip Indicator, while very subjective and not a precise timing tool, does shed some light on the current mood on Wall Street. And with the new breed of bearish strategists currently calling the shots, it may very well be an opportune time to play the contrarian card and turn bullish.

Conclusion

       The stock market has seemingly lulled the bulls to sleep with another one of its bear market rallies (Oct/Nov) followed by a pullback (Dec/Jan). Robust earnings reports have failed to materialize to spark stock prices, and the potential Iraqi War has acted as a shroud.
       Bears continue to grab headlines with gloomy prognostications of a secular bear market. While secular, or multiyear, bear markets are never fun, they are not necessarily disastrous either. According to the work of Dan Sullivan of The Chartist, in the last secular bear market (1966 1982); the stock market actually had gains in 59% of those years. Many cyclical bull markets emerged within the context of the bear, with extraordinary gains in 1975 and 1976 immediately following the worst of the damage.
       We are still cautious due to the sentiment figures. The Investors Intelligence survey continues to show bulls (47.2%) outnumbering bears (29.2%) by a wide margin a phenomenon we would like to see reverse itself in order to confirm a classic bottom. However, the Pink Slip Indicator is bullish (from a contrarian point of view), and Walt Deemer notes that total Rydex bearish fund assets have topped $2.1 billion more than the $1.6 billion seen at the October low. He refers to this as "active" bearishness, as opposed to opinions and surveys.
       We remain cautiously optimistic and believe this tug-o-war will resolve itself to the upside. Focus on value and position yourselves for the long-term potential not the short-term "noise".
       Editor's Note: Barry Arnold is editor of The Primary Trend, 700 North Water Street, Milwaukee, WI 53202. 1 year, 12 issues $80. Published by Arnold Investment Council, which provides investment counseling/portfolio management services to clients and to The Primary Trend family of no-load mutual funds. Visit the web site at www.primarytrendfunds.com.

|| TABLE OF CONTENTS ||

Bull & Bear Newsletter Digest || Bull & Bear Reporter Featured Companies || Monetary Digest
|| Featured Newsletters || Featured Companies || Featured Services ||
|| Classifieds/Advertisers || Links || Bull & Bear Archive || Search || E-Mail ||
||
About Us || How to Subscribe ||How to Advertise || IR Programs ||

The Bull & Bear Financial Report
Copyright 2003 | All Rights Reserved
Reproduction in whole or part is strictly prohibited
without prior written permision
NOTE:
The Bull & Bear Financial Report does not itself endorse
or guarantee the accuracy or reliability of information,
statements or opinionsexpressed by any individuals or
organizations posted on this site
PLEASE READ DISCLAIMER

Web Site Designed & Maintained by

Estrada Design & Communications

in association with

THE BULL & BEAR INTERNET DIVISION
1-800-336-BULL